Two things about this article.
First. I’ve Blogged about this before: Feminists and Communists have the same platform. The Feminists endorse Hillary Clinton. Keep that in mind when you read something like this:
John Edwards would be a better women’s President than Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Edwards said yesterday, trashing the New York senator as too quiet on feminist issues and too muddled on abortion.
So, Edwards is more of a Communist than Clinton?
Second.
But she said she was sympathetic to Clinton and understood, from her own dealings with male lawyers, why Clinton might not focus on women’s issues.
“You want to reassure them you’re as good as a man. And sometimes you feel you have to behave as a man and not talk about women’s issues,” Edwards said.
Edwards, who is fighting terminal breast cancer, said that Clinton, aside from being a woman, has offered no reason for people to vote for her.
“When she announced her candidacy she said, ‘I’m in it to win it.’ What is that? That’s not a rationale,” Edwards said.
So, is Mrs. Edwards saying that when a woman wants to be taken seriously in the work world and in politics, she needs to act like a man?
Recent Comments