11 responses to “From SA to LA: New Bishop for Los Angeles!”

  1. [...] the rest here:  From SA to LA: New Bishop for Los Angeles! By admin | category: University of NAVARRA | tags: amsterdam, catholic, cobreros, [...]

  2. While I have heard some good things about Archbishop Gomez(his distaste for divorce, homosexual acts, abortion, and birth control, as well as his joy for Summorum Pontificum), he puts such emphasis on Hispanic Ministry, it’s as if non-Hispanics are being made to not feel welcome.

  3. Not long before the Holy Father chose Archbishop Gomez to lead our archdiocese, I read that Cardinal Mahony said he wanted his successor to be Hispanic. The truth is, he would’ve been okay with an Asian, an African-American, or anyone “of color”, but he SAID Hispanic because he was aware of how unlike him a lot of the Caucasians the Holy Father chose to lead our sees have been, and he felt a prelate “of color” would be everything he is(he only said he wanted a Hispanic successor because he sensed anyone else “of color” might not have a chance, and a Caucasian would be everything he is not). Cardinal Mahony seems to think one’s views on liturgy are based on ethnicity and/or skin color.

  4. I disagree with both Evelyn Rodriguez and Bernabe Velarde. How effective a prelate Archbishop Gomez is/will be will have NOTHING to do with the demographics of Los Angeles Catholic churches, but what he does. And no, Gomez was NOT chosen because of his heritage! If he was, how come Phoenix Bishop Thomas Olmsted(who’s Caucasian) and then-Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput(Gomez’s old boss when the future San Antonio prelate was Denver’s auxiliary bishop, who is half-Caucasian, half-Native American) also made the Pope’s short list of three to succeed Cardinal Mahony?! What Velarde says makes no sense, and he tries to make the Holy Father look like a Catholic Archie Bunker, which he doesn’t come close to being!

  5. If Bernabe Velarde thinks Hispanics are so prejudiced as to ONLY tolerate one of their own as prelate, he should think again. Many, even most Hispanics are more concerned with having a prelate that will be a good shepherd, no matter what his ancestry, than act like heritage should play at least a minor role in who is chosen to lead a particular see.

  6. Last night, I heard on the local news that Los Angeles Auxiliary Bishop Gambino Zavala, a modernist if there ever was one, resigned because he violated his celibacy vows(he fathered two children). Some people have the nerve to suggest Holy Mother Church be rid of celibacy; that’s like trying to reward a child for bad behavior. On a happier note, Archbishop Gomez may let the FSSP in our archdiocese if enough signatures are sent in. I’d like for you to pray for our attempts to get a personal parish for Latin Mass, and for a worthy(and dare I say, non-modernist) as auxiliary bishop to replace Zavala.

  7. For a guy who was hoping Phoenix’s Bishop Thomas Olmsted would get the Los Angeles epicopate(and was far from happy when he did not get sent to “The Big Orange”, a moderately obscure nickname for Los Angeles), even I have to admit Gomez is not doing a bad job(though his lack of distaste for “ethnic” ministry sits poorly with me). He seems willing to work with those who want the FSSP in Los Angeles(if willing is a strong enough word to describe it).

  8. The fact that Archbishop Gomez was our country’s first Opus Dei-ordained prelate brings something to mind; Kansas City-Saint Joseph Bishop Robert Finn is, to my knowledge, the second(Finn is such a good shepherd I, when I wrote to our late nuncio, Archbishop Pietro Sambi, to recommend men to lead dioceses, recommended Bishop Finn, Minneapolis-Saint Paul Archbishop John Neinstedt, and Chicago Auxiliary Bishop Joseph Perry as candidates to succeed Cardinal Francis George as Chicago Archbishop).

  9. Dear eronyeve! I love to know our new and updated page here. I’ll let our community know we have happy ground here. God the father Bless to you all.

  10. As much as Cardinal Mahony said he wanted a HISPANIC successor(though he would’ve been okay with anyone “of color”; he didn’t want a Caucasian because he sensed if a Caucasian was named to Los Angeles, he’d be everything Cardinal Mahony is not, but felt a Hispanic, an African-American, an Asian, et al, would be everything he is) I heard he was NOT happy when Archbishop Gomez was sent here(he is, needless to say, NOT Mahony’s type of Hispanic, and their opposing views on Latin Mass, homosexual acts, and who knows what else, are proof).

  11. Not long after he was named coadjutor for the Los Angeles Archdiocese, I heard Archbishop Gomez wanted to make our cathedral look like an actual church. Let’s hope he does.

Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook